BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Value Betting — Where the Edge Lives

BTTS value betting — What We Found

• Sweet spot: BTTS YES with model edge ≥ 10% and odds in the 1.85–2.20 window.
• Backtest result: 882 settled bets → +37.84u profit, 4.29% ROI, 54.65% win rate.
• Performance is strongest in a handful of leagues (see the league stats below).
• Want today’s picks? The daily BTTS Beast — Value YES selections are in Platinum Bets.

How We Tested BTTS value betting

We analysed our resulted BTTS dataset and filtered for selections where the model’s BTTS-YES edge was at least 10%.
We then restricted pricing to the 1.85–2.20 range and settled every bet using full-time scores (flat 1u stakes).
The idea was simple: isolate a realistic price band and see whether the model’s edge actually translates into profit.

Headline Result BTTS value betting

In total, 882 settled bets qualified under the edge ≥ 10% and odds 1.85–2.20 rules. BTTS value betting that produced:

• Profit: +37.84 units
• ROI: +4.29%
• Win rate: 54.65%

Where the Pricing Works Best

When we split prices into 0.05 bands, a few pockets stood out:

• 1.85–1.90: strong contribution and healthy win rate.
• 2.05–2.10: excellent return (with slightly smaller volume).

The takeaway: the lane from 1.85 to 2.10 is the engine room. Extending to 2.20 is fine, but expect fewer bets.

League Snapshot (Edge ≥10%, Odds 1.85–2.20)

Here are a few leagues that contributed positively in this window. This isn’t an iron-clad rulebook—just a helpful map of where the model’s signal has converted well:

League	Bets	Win %	Profit (u)	Avg Odds
Italy Serie B	36	63.9%	+10.09	~2.01
Croatia 1. HNL	17	70.6%	+7.77	~2.08
Japan J1 League	7	100.0%	+6.90	~1.99
Spain La Liga	58	53.4%	+5.54	~2.05
Brazil Serie A	10	70.0%	+4.51	~2.05
Brazil Serie B	4	100.0%	+4.50	~2.13
Greece Super League	32	53.1%	+3.29	~2.06
England Premier League	9	66.7%	+3.06	~2.02
China CSL	7	71.4%	+2.81	~1.95
England League One	25	56.0%	+2.71	~1.97

How to Use This

1. Filter first: take BTTS value betting only when the model edge ≥ 10%.
2. Price discipline: target odds in the 1.85–2.10 lane (extend to 2.20 if you want more action, but expect thinner volume).
3. Lean into the right leagues: prioritise competitions that typically play well with this profile (see table).

Today’s Picks

If you want the actionable shortlist each day, the BTTS Beast — Value YES feed is available in
Platinum Bets.

Stake.com

Welcome offers and weekly bonuses, you won’t find better value on the BTTS anywhere else

Arc 2025 trends: Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe data-led preview (+ Ascot, Newmarket, Redcar)

If you’re hunting for Arc 2025 trends in plain English, this is it. I’ve distilled the last eight runnings of the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe at Longchamp (12f / 2400m) into clear angles and mapped them to this year’s field. Quick links: see the Arc racecard, our draw guide, and trip distances (what is 12f?). For official info: France Galop, Ascot, Newmarket, Redcar.

Arc 2025 trends: full Longchamp profile & top pick

Race: Qatar Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe (Group 1) — 3yo+ (no geldings), turf
Where/When: Longchamp, Paris — Sun 05 Oct 2025, 3:05
Top Trend Horse: Kalpana — Score 76.0 | Matched 12/23 | Bet365 9/1 | Sample 8
See full runners on the Arc racecard.

What typically wins the Arc? A proven Group 1 horse, won last time out, prepped 21–29 days ago, comfortable at 12f / 2400m, drawn stalls 3–8, and ridden by a professional jockey (no claim). Those are the clearest Arc 2025 trends.

Complete Arc trend sheet (last 8 runnings)

• 8/8 – Highest Pattern Win = Group 1
• 8/8 – Last Run Distance (f) between 10 and 12
• 8/8 – Previously won at same distance
• 8/8 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
• 7/8 – Last Run Position between 1 and 1 (won LTO)
• 7/8 – Previous Wins Count between 3 and 8
• 7/8 – Previously won at same course
• 7/8 – Wore no headgear
• 6/8 – Aged between 3 and 4
• 6/8 – Days Since Last Run between 21 and 29
• 6/8 – Draw between 3 and 8
• 6/8 – Last Run Class = Unknown
• 6/8 – SP Dec between 2 and 8.3
• 6/8 – Weight (lbs) between 128 and 131 (≈ 9st 2lb–9st 5lb)
• 4/8 – Male horses (Colts or Geldings)
• 3/8 – Female horses (Fillies or Mares)
• 2/8 – Jockey = Cristian Demuro
• 2/8 – Jockey = Frankie Dettori
• 2/8 – Last Run Class = Class 1
• 2/8 – Last Run Course = Leopardstown (IRE)
• 2/8 – Last Run Course = Longchamp (FR)
• 2/8 – Trainer = J-C Rouget
• 2/8 – Trainer = John Gosden
• 1/8 – High SP Dec outlier = 14.1
• 1/8 – High SP Dec outlier = 73
• 1/8 – High SP Dec outlier = 8.3
• 1/8 – Unknown or other sex categories

Why Kalpana fits: ticks the biggest boxes—G1 on the CV, 12f aptitude, recent win, right 21–29 day cadence, pro jockey. If the stall draw lands between 3–8, that’s another strong green flag. Want more context? Check our Trends glossary and how we score trends.

---

Ascot — BetMGM Challenge Cup (Heritage Handicap, 7f)

Off: Sat 04 Oct 2025, 3:35
Top Trend Horse: Purosangue — Score 85.0 | Matched 12/18 | Bet365 16/1 | Sample 9
Race details: Ascot Challenge Cup card · Course: Ascot

• 9/9 – Male horses (Colts or Geldings)
• 8/9 – Days Since Last Run between 14 and 43
• 8/9 – Last Run Distance (f) between 6 and 8

Newmarket — BetMGM Sun Chariot Stakes (Group 1, Fillies & Mares, 1m)

Off: Sat 04 Oct 2025, 2:40
Top Trend Horse: Blue Bolt — Score 100.0 | Matched 13/24 | Bet365 15/2 | Sample 10
Race details: Sun Chariot card · Course: Newmarket

• 10/10 – Female horses (Fillies or Mares)
• 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
• 9/10 – Aged between 3 and 4
• 9/10 – Previously won at same distance

Redcar — William Hill Two Year Old Trophy (Listed)

Off: Sat 04 Oct 2025, 3:20
Top Trend Horse: Isle Of Fernandez — Score 92.0 | Matched 12/24 | Bet365 13/2 | Sample 10
Race details: Two Year Old Trophy card · Course: Redcar

• 10/10 – Aged 2
• 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
• 10/10 – Wore no headgear

---

How to use these Arc 2025 trends (sensible caveat)

Trends are filters, not finish orders. Blend them with the going, final draw, pace maps, and market signals before you bet. For live updates, refresh the racecards hub and check official info at France Galop.

Here are my BTTS (Both Teams To Score) value picks for Wednesday, 1 October 2025. I’m keeping this simple and human: quick reasons you can sanity-check, the price range I’m seeing, and how confident the model is versus the market. As always, odds move—treat these as a starting point, not gospel.

---

Today’s BTTS short list BTTS value picks

• Union Saint-Gilloise vs Newcastle United (UEFA Champions League) — BTTS Yes
  Model: 73.6% vs Market: 55.3% (edge +18.3%) • Guide price ~1.72

• Norwich City vs West Brom (Championship) — BTTS Yes
  Model: 66.8% vs Market: 54.2% (edge +12.6%) • Guide price ~1.73

• Bayer Leverkusen vs PSV (UEFA Champions League) — BTTS Yes
  Model: 70.8% vs Market: 60.3% (edge +10.5%) • Guide price ~1.60

• QPR vs Oxford United (Championship) — BTTS Yes
  Model: 57.0% vs Market: 51.7% (edge +5.4%) • Guide price ~1.86

---

Why these four? BTTS Value Picks

Union Saint-Gilloise vs Newcastle — BTTS Yes

Two proactive sides with decent set-piece threat and a tendency to leave space when they push. The numbers have bothteams’ scoring rates comfortably above 1.0 xG, and minor defensive absences tilt things a touch further toward BTTS. Feels like a game where one goal wakes it up.

What would change my mind? If one team puts out an unexpectedly conservative XI (three out-and-out DMs, say) or if rain + heavy pitch is worse than expected.

---

Norwich City vs West Brom — BTTS Yes

Championship chaos in the best way. Norwich are usually good for creating chances at home, and West Brom aren’t shy about trading shots. The model doesn’t see either back line dominating, so both to score is the cleanest angle.

Watch-outs: Late attacking injury on either side would nudge the probability down. Check lineups.

---

Bayer Leverkusen vs PSV — BTTS Yes

Front-foot vs front-foot. Leverkusen’s wide rotations create loads of cut-backs; PSV are slick in transition. Even if one scores early, the other has enough punch to reply. Model BTTS Value Picks has this north of 70% before kick.

If you prefer safer prices: Pair BTTS with a “No Red Card” side bet if your book offers it; chaotic reds can kill good BTTS spots.

---

QPR vs Oxford United — BTTS Yes

Smaller edge, but still a tick in our favour. Neither defence grades out as a “lockdown” unit and the expected goal split is close enough that we only need an average game state to get there.

Pass if: You only bet bigger edges. This one’s more “portfolio filler” than headline play for BTTS value picks.

---

Staking (if you must)

BTTS is swingy. If you use Kelly, try half-Kelly or cap stakes around 2–3% of bankroll per bet. I’m happier spreading smaller stakes across multiple edges than going heavy on one.

---

Final notes BTTS Value Picks

• Re-check lineups 30–60 minutes before kick-off. A surprise striker benching or a late defensive return can shift the edge.

• Prices are snapshots; shop around. A few ticks on the odds can make or break value on BTTS.

 

https://www.smartbettingstats.com

https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/

The Doncaster St Leger Festival 2025 including Doncaster St Leger trends rolls on today, and as always this meeting throws up plenty of betting angles. Whether you’re a trends follower or prefer looking for handicappers lurking below their last winning mark, there are some interesting runners to keep onside.

Here’s a look at the Doncaster trends picks in Doncaster St Leger trends for Saturday, plus the horses running below their last winning mark that could be ready to strike.

---

Today’s Doncaster Trend Picks Including Doncaster St Leger trends

The trends have highlighted a few strong contenders on the card:

• 1:15 – Great Chieftain (10/1)
  Fits the profile well with 12 key trends in his favour.

• 1:50 – Gewan (13/8)
  Comes out on top with a perfect 100 score. All the stats point towards a big run.

• 2:25 – Seven Questions (40/1)
  Big price but matches plenty of key angles. Could outrun the odds.

• 3:00 – Marvelman (11/2)
  Another that looks rock solid on the numbers.

• 3:40 – Tarriance (25/1)
  Scores a massive 104. Interesting outsider who could go close if things drop right.

• 4:50 – Our Golden One (14/1) & Sportingsilvermine (15/2)
  Not as strong on the trends but both worth a second look in what should be a competitive closer.

👉 One to note: Gewan is the clear standout on trends, while Tarriance looks the value play in Doncaster St Leger trends

---

Horses Running Below Their Last Winning Mark

Punters love to spot horses running off a rating lower than their last win – it’s often where the value lies. At Doncaster today, a few fit the bill:

• Shadow Of Light (3:00) – Back down to his last winning mark, trained by Charlie Appleby.

• Audience (3:00) – Another dropping to a competitive rating for John & Thady Gosden.

• Chipstead (2:25) – Roger Teal’s sprinter is now off 95, having scored off 97 before.

• Rosario (2:25) – Consistent type who shouldn’t be far away on this mark.

• Father Of Jazz (1:15) – Miles below his last winning figure. Interesting if fit.

• Seven Questions (2:25) – Also shows up strongly here, making him a dual angle horse today.

👉 Dual Angle Pick: Seven Questions – matches the trends and is below his last winning rating.

---

Final Thoughts

• Best Trend Pick: Gewan (1:50 Doncaster) – everything lines up perfectly.

• Best Value Bet: Tarriance (3:40 Doncaster) – huge trend score at big odds.

• One to Watch: Seven Questions (2:25 Doncaster) – fits two key angles, could surprise.

Today’s Doncaster racing looks set to provide a mix of solid favourites and lively outsiders. The stats point strongly towards Gewan, but the value might lie with the likes of Tarriance (Doncaster St Leger trends) and Seven Questions.

https://www.doncaster-racecourse.co.uk

https://smartbettingstats.com

Newcastle United v Liverpool – key match injuries

The todays injuries tab flags Alexander Isak as unavailable (listed as suspended) — and that’s the headline “key match injuries” angle here. With Isak on the pitch Newcastle have won 59% of games (34 played), but in the 4 matches he didn’t feature that drops to 0% — a swing of +59 percentage points. His presence correlates with higher attacking output: goals for up by +1.72 per game and xG for +0.31, albeit with a small rise in goals against (+0.26) and a negligible xGA shift (+0.01). Entertainment metrics lean the same way: BTTS up by +28pp and Over 2.5 up by +68pp when he plays. On the Liverpool side the todays injuries lists Conor Bradley as doubtful under “key match injuries”: in a small 7-game sample when he’s played, Liverpool’s win rate is 43% versus 71% without him (-28pp), with xGA higher (+0.35) and BTTS up (+31pp). Sample sizes matter, but Isak’s absence stands out as the decisive “key match injuries” factor in this fixture.

Athletic Bilbao v Rayo Vallecano – key match injuries

For Bilbao, Oihan Sancet is marked doubtful among the “key match injuries” and his influence looks positive: when he plays (19 games) Athletic’s win rate is 58% versus 42% without him (+16pp), with xG for up (+0.15) and xG against down (-0.14). Beñat Prados (also doubtful) shows a milder, mixed signal (-5pp win rate difference; tiny defensive improvement). Rayo’s “key match injuries” note is Abdul Mumin (injured): with him in the XI (24 games) Rayo’s win rate is +9pp higher than without, and they concede fewer goals (GA -0.61) with a small defensive xG improvement (xGA -0.02). Net: Sancet’s availability tilts Bilbao’s attack upwards, while Mumin’s absence could soften Rayo’s back line — both meaningful “key match injuries” levers for this matchup.

Sevilla FC v Getafe CF

Sevilla’s  list includes Tanguy Nianzou (injured). When he features (6 games) Sevilla’s win rate is 50% versus 22% without him (+28pp). It’s a curious profile: goals for rise (+0.27) and goals against drop (-0.73) with him, even though xG for dips slightly (-0.18) and xGA improves a touch (-0.03). For Getafe, Borja Mayoral is flagged doubtful under “key match injuries”: in the 7 games he’s played the win rate is lower (14% vs 32%, -18pp), with goals for down (-0.40) and xGA higher (+0.35), hinting that his recent minutes have coincided with more open — and less favourable — game states. Overall, Sevilla’s absentee picture suggests a sturdier balance if Nianzou is available, while Getafe’s attack looks blunter if Mayoral isn’t at full tilt.

All figures above come directly from our todays injuries tab https://smartbettingstats.com/today-injuries/ : “Games Played” vs “Games Not Played”, Win%, goals (GF/GA) and expected goals (xG for/against) differences, plus BTTS/Over 2.5 percentage-point shifts.

https://www.skysports.com

Eng Prem Key Players

Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest

For Palace, Edward Nketiah played 9 games last season and missed 29 not really a Eng Prem Key Players due to the number of games played. The Eagles won 22% with him (PPG 1.11) compared to 38% without (PPG 1.48). They scored almost the same (1.33 vs 1.34 goals per game), but the expected goals tell a better story — Palace created 1.47 xG with him versus 1.29 without, suggesting he sharpened the attack even if results didn’t show it. Cheick Doucouré (4 games, 34 missed) brought a similar output — win rate 25% vs 35%, with the side generating 1.24 xG with him compared to 1.34 without. Chadi Riad, Matheus França and Caleb Kporha hardly featured, so their statistical impact is negligible.

For Forest, Nicolás Domínguez was a consistent presence with 23 games and 15 absences. Forest won 52% when he played (PPG 1.70) versus 47% without (PPG 1.73), showing very little difference in results. The attack returned 1.52 goals per game with him against 1.53 without, while xG figures were also stable (1.27 for, 1.50 against compared to 1.29 for, 1.60 against). In short, his presence kept things steady rather than transformative.

---

Eng Prem Key Players Everton vs Brighton

Eng Prem Key Players Everton’s defensive lynchpin Jarrad Branthwaite played 28 times and missed 10. With him, the Toffees won 32% of matches (PPG 1.39) compared to 20% without (PPG 0.90). Goals For were 1.18 vs 0.90, and Goals Against improved to 1.00 from 1.60 when absent. xG numbers were almost identical in attack (1.16 vs 1.17) but slightly better at the back with him (1.39 vs 1.41). By contrast, Nathan Patterson made just 3 appearances (35 missed), all defeats, with Everton scoring 1.00 and conceding 1.33 per game, compared to 1.11 for and 1.14 against without him.

Brighton’s Adam Webster had 11 appearances and missed 27, and his impact was huge. With him, Brighton won 82% (PPG 2.55) versus only 26% without (PPG 1.22). They scored 2.64 goals per game with him compared to 1.37 without, and conceded fewer too (1.18 vs 1.70). The xG story echoed this: 1.59 for and 1.16 against with him, against 1.40 for and 1.13 against without. Julio Enciso featured just twice, with Brighton losing both — but his presence lifted the attack (xG For 1.71 vs 1.44). Solly March played only once, where Brighton won and scored three, though the sample size is too small to matter.

---

Fulham vs Manchester United

For United, Lisandro Martínez played 20 games and missed 18. The win rate with him was 40% (PPG 1.35) compared to 17% without (PPG 0.83). United scored 1.30 goals per game with him (vs 1.00 without), while conceding slightly fewer (1.40 vs 1.44). On xG, the attack dipped a little (1.39 vs 1.48) but the defence improved (1.14 vs 1.26). In short, results and defensive numbers were better when he was involved.

By contrast, Noussair Mazraoui played almost the whole season — 34 appearances, just 4 missed. With him United’s win rate was 26% (PPG 1.06) compared to 50% without (PPG 1.50). Goals For fell from 2.50 without him to 1.00 with, while Goals Against worsened to 1.29 from 2.50. The xG numbers backed it up: 1.41 for and 1.21 against with him, against 1.64 for and 1.07 against without. Despite being a starter, his inclusion correlated with weaker results.

https://smartbettingstats.com/today-injuries/?league=England+Premier+League

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/scores-fixtures

Today’s York Ebor Meeting Stats and Trends matching horses day 4, including the Ebor handicap which is the biggest handicap in Europe.

Todays top matching horses below

Top Ebor Meeting Stats and Trends Horses — 23 Aug 2025

York 3:35
Horse: Real Dream
Score: 74.0
Odds: 40/1
Trends:
– 6/8 – Draw between 12 and 24
– 6/8 – Weight (lbs) between 131 and 135
– 6/8 – Aged between 5 and 6
– 4/8 – Aged = 6
– 7/8 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 6/8 – Last Run Position between 3 and 6

—

York 2:25
Horse: Pole Star
Score: 47.0
Matched Trends: 8 / 27 (Sample: 8)
Odds: 7/1
Trends:
– 6/8 – Weight (lbs) between 131 and 135
– 7/8 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 6/8 – Last Run Beaten Distance between 0 and 4.5
– 6/8 – Previous Wins Count between 3 and 4
– 3/8 – Previous Wins Count = 3

—

York 1:50
Horse: King’s Gambit
Score: 89.0
Matched Trends: 13 / 36 (Sample: 10)
Odds: 3/1
Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 1 and 5
– 7/10 – Weight (lbs) between 131 and 133
– 7/10 – Aged between 3 and 4
– 5/10 – Aged = 4
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 9/10 – Wore no headgear
– 7/10 – Previous Wins Count between 2 and 3

—

York 4:10
Horse: Chief Mankato
Score: 42.0
Matched Trends: 14 / 44 (Sample: 3)
Odds: 18/1
Trends:
– 3/3 – Draw between 2 and 20
– 3/3 – Weight (lbs) between 119 and 135
– 3/3 – Aged between 3 and 9
– 3/3 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 3/3 – Wore some form of headgear

Horse: Jubilee Walk
Score: 42.0
Matched Trends: 14 / 44 (Sample: 3)
Odds: 11/2
Trends:
– 3/3 – Draw between 2 and 20
– 3/3 – Weight (lbs) between 119 and 135
– 3/3 – Aged between 3 and 9
– 3/3 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 3/3 – Wore some form of headgear
– 3/3 – Last Run Position between 1 and 4

—

York 5:20
Horse: Erzindjan
Score: 16.0
Matched Trends: 9 / 35 (Sample: 2)
Odds: 15/2
Trends:
– 2/2 – Draw between 1 and 8
– 2/2 – Weight (lbs) between 133 and 138
– 2/2 – Aged between 6 and 8
– 1/2 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 2/2 – Last Run Position between 2 and 4

Horse: Marhaba Ghaiyyath
Score: 16.0
Matched Trends: 9 / 35 (Sample: 2)
Odds: 5/1
Trends:
– 2/2 – Weight (lbs) between 133 and 138
– 1/2 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 2/2 – Last Run Position between 2 and 4
– 2/2 – Last Run Beaten Distance between 0.05 and 1.5
– 2/2 – Previous Wins Count between 1 and 3

—

York 4:45
Horse: Dickensian
Score: 109.0
Matched Trends: 14 / 24 (Sample: 10)
Odds: 5/1
Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 1 and 7
– 7/10 – Weight (lbs) between 126 and 129
– 10/10 – Aged between 2 and 2
– 10/10 – Aged = 2
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 8/10 – Wore no headgear
– 7/10 – Last Run Position between 1 and 5
– 7/10 – Last Run Beaten Distance between 0 and 4.25

Horse: Rydale Frosty
Score: 109.0
Matched Trends: 14 / 24 (Sample: 10)
Odds: 6/1
Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 1 and 7
– 7/10 – Weight (lbs) between 126 and 129
– 10/10 – Aged between 2 and 2
– 10/10 – Aged = 2
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 8/10 – Wore no headgear
– 7/10 – Last Run Position between 1 and 5
– 7/10 – Last Run Beaten Distance between 0 and 4.25

—

Day 3 at the York Ebor Festival on Friday has some good racing, smartbettingstats has sifted through the trends to find the top matching horses in each race, see below.

 

Top Trend Horses  — 22 Aug 2025

York 3:35
Horse: Mgheera
Score: 100.0
Odds: 11/1
Sample of York Ebor Meeting Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 3 and 8
– 7/10 – Weight (lbs) between 136 and 139
– 7/10 – Aged between 4 and 5
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 9/10 – Wore no headgear
– 8/10 – Last Run Position between 1 and 2

—

York 2:25
Horse: Sweet William
Score: 78.0
Odds: 5/1
Sample of York Ebor Meeting Trends:
– 6/7 – Draw between 1 and 4
– 5/7 – Weight (lbs) between 129 and 131
– 6/7 – Aged between 5 and 6
– 3/7 – Aged = 6
– 7/7 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 6/7 – Wore no headgear
– 6/7 – Last Run Position between 1 and 3

—

York 3:00
Horse: Lifeplan
Score: 79.0
Odds: 11/2
Sample of Trends:
– 5/7 – Draw between 4 and 8
– 6/7 – Weight (lbs) between 126 and 128
– 7/7 – Aged between 2 and 2
– 7/7 – Aged = 2
– 7/7 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 7/7 – Wore no headgear
– 6/7 – Last Run Position between 1 and 3

—

York 1:50
Horse: French Duke
Score: 30.0
Odds: 4/1
Sample of Trends:
– 3/3 – Draw between 7 and 10
– 3/3 – Weight (lbs) between 126 and 137
– 3/3 – Aged between 4 and 4
– 3/3 – Aged = 4
– 3/3 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 3/3 – Wore no headgear
– 3/3 – Last Run Position between 2 and 10

—

York 4:10
Horse: Roarin’ Success
Score: 36.0
Odds: 10/1
Sample of Trends:
– 3/3 – Draw between 1 and 4
– 3/3 – Weight (lbs) between 121 and 135
– 3/3 – Aged between 4 and 6
– 1/3 – Aged = 5
– 3/3 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 3/3 – Wore no headgear
– 3/3 – Last Run Position between 1 and 8

—

York 5:20
Horse: Point Of Contact
Score: 24.0
Odds: 14/1
Trends:
– 2/2 – Draw between 1 and 7
– 2/2 – Aged between 3 and 3
– 2/2 – Aged = 3
– 2/2 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 2/2 – Wore no headgear
– 2/2 – Last Run Position between 5 and 7

—

York 4:45
Horse: Naval Light
Score: 111.0
Odds: 9/4
Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 1 and 6
– 9/10 – Weight (lbs) between 131 and 133
– 10/10 – Aged between 2 and 2
– 10/10 – Aged = 2
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 9/10 – Wore no headgear
– 7/9 – Last Run Position between 2 and 3

Horse: Red Spells Danger
Score: 111.0
Odds: 22/1
Trends:
– 7/10 – Draw between 1 and 6
– 9/10 – Weight (lbs) between 131 and 133
– 10/10 – Aged between 2 and 2
– 10/10 – Aged = 2
– 10/10 – Ridden by professional jockeys (no claim)
– 9/10 – Wore no headgear
– 7/9 – Last Run Position between 2 and 3

https://www.yorkracecourse.co.uk/